0
0

[–] ghotioninabarrel ago 

This says nothing about time though, only the frequency at which cesium atoms vibrate in different scenarios

The thing is that the scenarios aren't actually different.

The earth orbits the sun, the sun orbits the galactic core, the galaxy itself is moving through space. In every reference frame other than the Earth's, the Earth's velocity is not constant, and varies by far more than the speed of an aircraft. So if the first postulate of special relativity (laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames) is false in this way, then the Earth is somehow a privileged reference frame.

0
0

[–] barset ago 

Saved. So I can read through the material and argue later. This one is one of my fans and I just don't have the moment right now.

0
0

[–] MorpheusGodofDreams ago 

That all depends on how you define time.

0
2

[–] doctorbranius 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I never thought about this experiment in this way, but I have always entertained the notion that past,present,future all happen at the same time.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
3

[–] firex726 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Yes that was humans is a pretty BS reason. That Mod needs to be removed for the betterment of the site.

0
4

[–] o_V_o [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Weren't you banned because somebody made an account with a name very similar to yours and then spammed on it, and they banned you by mistake?

Actually, if you look the ban log (go one page fwd to see impersonator account), I was banned a month before my impersonator, despite never actually posting any comments there... apparently by some vindictive mod I pissed off in an unrelated sub.

0
4

[–] reivin 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Never heard that theory before, thank you for the thought provoking reply.

0
5

[–] GreyAlien 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

interesting theory

0
1

[–] o_V_o [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Thanks. I haven't heard anyone else challenge this experiment in this way, but I have a sneaking suspicion there's a good reason... just waiting for someone to tell me why I'm wrong (and stupid, considering how things go online).

0
0

[–] MorpheusGodofDreams ago 

Well it all depends on how you define time, and if you define it in any way that can be measurable then your statement is incorrect but if time is immeasurable then perhaps you are right.

0
1

[–] GreyAlien 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I see time as something that we can't fully grasp with our biology like we are missing a few puzzle pieces mentally

0
19

[–] Cynabuns 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

Holy shit - I remember you being banned! This was around the time that MH101 was slightly altering the names of real users, mods too, and you got caught in that. Didn't you get zapped in v/politics too for same reason??

The correct username to have banned was u/o_V_o_ (which it was) and this has an underscore at the end, whereas yours, u/o_V_o does not have the underscore at the end. See this post too, https://voat.co/v/ReportSpammers/comments/531106.

Hey @Atko or @Puttitout - could you free up this genuine voater, u/o_V_o, from the banning in v/Science since there's no helper mods in there.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] barset 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Which IRC? I was trying to find a core voat IRC, but all I ever found was a few sub specific ones.

0
2

[–] PuttItOut 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

5 pages of bans in v/science?

0
6

[–] o_V_o [S] 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Holy shit - I remember you being banned!

Good times! :P

Didn't you get zapped in v/politics too for same reason

I might have, but I don't post there, so I don't really know.

since there's no helper mods in there.

is @system not a real person? I'm pretty sure I sent several msgs.. would explain the lack of response.

0
3

[–] Cynabuns 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

The @System is Atko & Putti; not sure if they actually get pinged with that though. And yeah - fun times LOL! Good luck

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)