0
0

[–] eagleshigh ago  (edited ago)

Right. It says the same shit, reworded.

I love that you take time out of your day to do this. Must have a really exciting life.

Lets discuss the linked paper.

What did you think of it?

The paper is also five years old and doesn't say anything new if you know of these things anyway. This is nothing new.

0
0

[–] watitdew [S] ago 

Re: the linked paper I thought it was very well organized and articulated. And yeah it's not saying anything new or anything we don't already know.

0
1

[–] eagleshigh 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Which is why it's not an earth shattering paper as its been out for five years, nothing new. No idea why it's being pushed as something new. Stupid fucks.

0
0

[–] watitdew [S] ago 

Yes, it says the same shit.

What you are missing is that his statement clearly articulates his point, whereas your statement just gives the reader a hurdle to parse.

0
0

[–] eagleshigh ago 

If you don't understand the statement, you should get your reading comprehension checked out.

So what did you think of the paper? Did you read it? No idea why it's some earth shattering paper, it's been out for five years and if you already know about dysgenic effects, the information presented is nothing new.