[–] watitdew [S] 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 4.6 years ago
No, that is a clear and concise statement.
You don't even proofread your own shit, evidently.
[–] eagleshigh 0 points 0 points 0 points (+0|-0) 4.6 years ago (edited 4.6 years ago)
Right. It says the same shit, reworded.
I love that you take time out of your day to do this. Must have a really exciting life.
Lets discuss the linked paper.
What did you think of it?
The paper is also five years old and doesn't say anything new if you know of these things anyway. This is nothing new.
Re: the linked paper I thought it was very well organized and articulated. And yeah it's not saying anything new or anything we don't already know.
Yes, it says the same shit.
What you are missing is that his statement clearly articulates his point, whereas your statement just gives the reader a hurdle to parse.
[–] eagleshigh ago (edited ago)
Right. It says the same shit, reworded.
I love that you take time out of your day to do this. Must have a really exciting life.
Lets discuss the linked paper.
What did you think of it?
The paper is also five years old and doesn't say anything new if you know of these things anyway. This is nothing new.
[–] watitdew [S] ago
Re: the linked paper I thought it was very well organized and articulated. And yeah it's not saying anything new or anything we don't already know.
[–] watitdew [S] ago
Yes, it says the same shit.
What you are missing is that his statement clearly articulates his point, whereas your statement just gives the reader a hurdle to parse.