[–] Kleyno 2 points 0 points 2 points (+2|-2) ago
Guy is a sexual predator, for sure, but not a paedophile by the medical definition.
Not that it really matters, I am just a stickler for using the correct definition of words.
His: I'm just getting something to eat, line was priceless. Yeah you were buddy, but it wasn't anything on their menu that you were interested in munching on.
[–] ThisIsntMe123 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Medical definition?
[–] Kleyno 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago (edited ago)
To put it at its most simplistic, it is a sexual attraction prepubescent minors. Prepubescent being the key word there. A 13 to 14 year old would be pubescent.
The guy's perversion could be wide, of course, but in this particular story, he is shown going after 13/14 year old boys, which would technically make him a hebephile.
EDIT: And here come the downvoats. Some people just don't like definitions, it seems. Next you'll be telling me I should call someone who had sex with a 15/16 year old a paedophile, too.
[–] klongtoey 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
best YT comment