1
1

[–] MinorLeakage 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

No just half of it

Which specific sentences from the post remain unverified? One sentence is mildly editorialized: "Hillary Clinton volunteered to be his lawyer". According to Clinton's own words she was asked by a prosecutor to take the case "because he wanted a female lawyer" and so she did "as a favor to him" (the prosecutor, I assume).

Tell me exactly what remains unverified? It seems like the only thing "half of it" applies to is your reading comprehension.

3
-2

[–] Jasoman 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

WHAT'S FALSE: Clinton laughed about the unreliable nature of polygraphs, not the case's outcome; Clinton did not volunteer to be the man's lawyer; Clinton did not claim the complainant fantasized about being raped by older men; the case did not go to trial. That half

1
1

[–] MinorLeakage 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Listen to the tape. Clinton generally finds the whole thing pretty hilarious. She does laugh at the "unreliable nature of polygraphs", specifically because her client passed one when she knew he was guilty. This is exactly what the posted picture says: "...she admitted she knew he was guilty. And she laughed about it". So 100% true.

Clinton was a public defender at the time, but the case was NOT assigned to her. She took the case as a favor, and received no additional payments for doing so. You can argue semantics over whether she "volunteered" or not, but she took a case that was not assigned to her, as a favor to a friend/acquaintance.

Clinton literally said, in a sworn affidavit (also included in the previous source) "...the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing." And "...children in early adolescence tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences...". So again, confirms 100% what the picture states.

Nowhere does the picture state the case went to trial. The arguments were put forward in pre-trial discovery, which, oddly enough, occurs in a courtroom.

So again. Everything in the picture is 100% verifiable and true. I doubt anything I've said will change your opinion, since it's obvious you never looked at the original evidence in the first place. Enjoy being told what to think by the editorials at Snopes though.