0
0

[–] w00dy [S] ago 

gross. was reading through the thread about post throttling for low-ccp users. it seemed to be implied through some of the comment chains there that that system is being considered due to one mod. i assume it's the same guy, i guess.

i really disagree with this making restrictive policy over a single mod. i hope this isn't the case.

0
0

[–] w00dy [S] ago 

should universal policy be being made due to rouge mods? isn't that a separate issue?

like, the structure, policy and algorithm are in place to interpret the community, and the mods and admins are meant to prune the ones that sneak through the filtering, right? but the mods are a part of that system, and that system is based around the users.

right?

0
0

[–] johnparish ago 

Then they cry about the admin limiting their free speech. I guess they could complain about this too. We currently have one main guy dealing with everything site wide so it can get kinda tough on him. That part of it is imperfect, not sure how he will deal with the site getting more traffic, I unfortunately am not totally in the know.

I am gonna reply to your other comment here too, even if it was just him, more like him will come and abuse that system. The user, I am aware of him, and the only subs that had that high downvote thing were his, so doing it was more to limit him. I am not sure of other subs that have that limit, I guess they could exist. They could easily change their system to allow downvoting if they wanted to be seen on /v/all

Just like Reddits /all is not an accurate measure of all their subs, I guess in a different way Voats are not either.

0
0

[–] w00dy [S] ago 

as i see it, a toxic individual complaining about "their free speech" isn't so much of an issue as restricting the entire userbase.

I hope atko finds some good help. its a big job for one guy.

so i guess as things are now, subs like his would mess up /all/new? sigh. i don't see a clean solution that doesn't involve direct admin management or affecting /all/hot