0
17

[–] luckyguy 0 points 17 points (+17|-0) ago 

Edible mushroom is completely non-toxic

Citation needed. We are still discovering that a lot of the medicine we assumed was safe is toxic. You can't just claim a mushroom with plastic derivitives in it is safe.

0
4

[–] GIF-lLL-S0NG 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

GM fungus, completely safe and harmless

3
0

[–] ratsmack 3 points 0 points (+3|-3) ago 

Says the scientist.... with a gun to his head held by the money grubbing capitalist.

0
7

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

There's bacteria that eats plastic too, but they aren't edible like these mushrooms. I love mushrooms, but I'm not going to eat a plastic-eating mushroom. I prefer my mushrooms to feast on plain old manure. ;)

1
1

[–] 2716057 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Why would we want our plastics eating our mushrooms? That seems like such a waste of mushrooms!

1
0

[–] Warden 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

lol, thought the same.

A hyphen would've avoided confusion but it's not a big deal so don't be a bitch about it OP.

0
2

[–] mirimar 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The cost of using UV light alone makes the whole project economically unviable. Recycling would be far cheaper.

edit: grammer

0
0

[–] RedditDead2005-2015 ago 

Yeah, that raised an eyebrow too. Creating one waste to get rid of another. Even if they used solar panels to power the lights, the solar panels still took oil and plastic to make.

0
0

[–] SpitfireXVI ago 

Its real, but how Realistic is widespead use? will this be licensed ultra cheep or what.

0
0

[–] Hypothetical_Boner ago 

You'd need farms full of these things.

0
0

[–] Dumb_Comment_Bot ago 

I feel like the end goal is making carbon dioxide, I mean unless you eat them. Which you might as well burn it at point. Especially if you are going through the effort of depolymerizing it with UV.

0
0

[–] Al_Rubyx ago 

We know how to get rid of plastic, just not billions of tons a year

0
0

[–] umilmi81 ago 

So just to summarize. Technology saves the day again and regressive environmentalism is wrong again.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)